Pamela Sue Castro v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
23
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini, in favor of Pamela Sue Castro against Carolyn W. Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 22 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order reman ding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing this action is DENIED; (3) judgment i s entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision and Order 22 ; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (wr)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
Case No. 5:16-cv-01071 (VEB)
8
9
10
PAMELA SUE CASTRO,
As heir and representative of the
Estate of Fernando Castro,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
JUDGMENT
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby
DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff’s request for an order remanding this case for further
proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED; (2) the
Commissioner’s request for an order affirming the Commissioner’s final decision
1
JUDGMENT – CASTRO v COLVIN 5:16-CV-01071-VEB
1
and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff’s favor
2
and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision
3
and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for
4
attorneys’ fees and costs.
5
DATED this 6th day of March, 2017,
6
7
/s/Victor E. Bianchini
VICTOR E. BIANCHINI
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2
JUDGMENT – CASTRO v COLVIN 5:16-CV-01071-VEB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?