Aaron Frye v. County of San Bernardino et al

Filing 29

ORDER ON STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 28 , the Court ORDERS that the action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to all Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All parties are to bear their own costs and fees. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a ) municipal entity, DEPUTY JOHNNIE ) MAMON, an individual, and DOES 1 ) ) through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AARON FRYE, an individual, CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-01090-AB (AGRx) [Proposed] ORDER ON STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 28 1 1 Pursuant to the Stipulation between Plaintiff AARON FRYE and Defendants 2 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and DEPUTY JOHNNIE MAMON, the 3 Court ORDERS as follows: 4 The above-captioned action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice 5 as to all Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil 6 Procedure. 7 All parties are to bear their own costs and fees. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 DATED: July 28, 2017 ________________________________ 12 HON. ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?