Robert McCarthy v. New California Investors et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/27/2016. (wm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL
Case No. 5:16−cv−01446−PSG−JC
ROBERT MCCARTHY V. NEW CALIFORNIA INVESTORS ET AL
Philip S. Gutierrez , U. S. District Judge
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Proceedings (In Chambers):
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing on or before October
27, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
The Court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this
Order to Show Cause.
Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.15, oral
argument will not be heard in this matter unless so ordered by the Court.
X Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff.
Response to Complaint by Defendant(s) OR Request for Entry of Default by
Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff OR Request to Clerk for Entry of
Default Judgment by Plaintiff.
Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal of the entire action.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.5, one mandatory chambers copy of every electronically
filed document must be delivered to Courtroom 880, no later than 12:00 p.m. on the
following business day. Further, the mandatory chambers copy shall comply with Local
Initials of Preparer: wm
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?