Nakada + Associates, Inc. et al v. City of El Monte, et al

Filing 45

JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF EL MONTE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE PLAINTIFFS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CLAIM AND DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, #43 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

JS-6
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
2
JAMES E. CURRY, Cal. Bar No. 115769
3 MICHAEL E. GERST, Cal. Bar No. 266514
[e-mail]
4 [e-mail]
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600
5 Los Angeles, California 90067-6055
Telephone: [phone]
6 Facsimile: 310.228.3701
7 Attorneys for Defendant City of El Monte
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

11
12 NAKADA + ASSOCIATES, INC.,
GANNETT FLEMING, INC.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
CITY OF EL MONTE, A
16 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, AND DOES 1-50,
17 INCLUSIVE,
Defendant.

18
19

Case No. EDCV 16-1467-GW(SPx)
JUDGMENT GRANTING
DEFENDANT CITY OF EL
MONTE’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE
PLAINTIFF’S COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT CLAIM AND
DECLINING TO EXERCISE
SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION
Date:
Time:
Location

June 1, 2017
8:30 A.M.
Courtroom 9D

Judge: Hon. George H. Wu
Complaint Filed: July 13, 2016

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:483086811.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF EL MONTE’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE PLAINTIFF’S COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CLAIM
AND DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

1

Defendant the City of El Monte’s (“El Monte”) Motion for Summary

2 Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication came on for hearing on June
3 1, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. in the above-titled Court. After considering the papers, the
4 evidence, and the arguments of counsel, the Court ORDERS as follows:
5

There are no disputed issues of material fact as to Plaintiffs Nakada +

6 Associates, Inc., and Gannett Fleming, Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Copyright Infringement
7 Claim pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 507(b). The Court declines to exercise Supplemental
8 Jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). Plaintiffs’ Copyright Claim is
9 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All of Plaintiffs’ remaining claims are hereby
10 DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, based on lack of jurisdiction. Judgment
11 is entered for El Monte and against Plaintiffs as to Plaintiffs’ Copyright
12 Infringement Claim.
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15 DATED: June 6, 2017
16
17
HON. GEORGE H. WU
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1SMRH:483086811.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF EL MONTE’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE PLAINTIFF’S COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CLAIM
AND DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION