Robert Frank Velasco v. W. L. Montgomery
Filing
35
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 31 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
9
10
ROBERT FRANK VELASCO,
Petitioner,
11
v.
12
13
W.L. MONTGOMERY, et. al.,
Respondent.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. ED CV 16-01547-SVW (AS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the
19
Petition,
all
of
the
records
herein
and
the
attached
Report
and
20
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
21
de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation
22
to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts
23
the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
After having made a
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the
Petition with prejudice.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order,
2
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein
3
on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.
4
5
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
6
7
DATED:
05/02/17
_____________________________.
8
9
10
11
___________________________________
STEPHEN V. WILSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?