Leonard Ward v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. To date, no proof of service has been filed indicating that defendants have been served. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff must serve summons and complaint on all named defendants within 90 days of filing. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS plaintiff to show cause, in writing, no later than November 10, 2016, why the Complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (dc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL
Case No. EDCV 16-01582-DTB
Date: October 21, 2016
Title: Leonard Ward v. California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, et al
============================================================
DOCKET ENTRY
===========================================================
PRESENT:
HON. DAVID T. BRISTOW, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D. Castellanos
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S):
None present
PROCEEDINGS:
n /a
Co urt Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT(S):
None present
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO
SERVE (IN CHAMBERS)
Plaintiff filed a Complaint herein on July 20, 2016. To date, no proof of service
has been filed indicating that defendants have been served. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff must serve summons and complaint on all
named defendants within 90 days of filing. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS plaintiff
to show cause, in writing, no later than November 10, 2016, why the Complaint should
not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk DC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?