Tommy E. Castillo v. Tuff Shed, Inc., et al

Filing 9

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR REMAND OF CASE TO CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting 8 REQUEST to Remand Case to State Court: Upon consideration of the Parties' joint stipulation, IT I S HEREBY ORDERED that this case shall be, and hereby is, remanded to California Superior Court for County of Riverside for further proceedings, without prejudice to Defendant to seek federal court jurisdiction should additional evidence be discovered through litigation that would support grounds for removal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any court hearings and pending deadlines are taken off calendar in this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear its own costs and fees in connection with the removal of the action and this remand. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (bm)

E-FILED 9/15/16
JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TOMMY E. CASTILLO, individually
11 and on behalf of others similarly
12 situated,
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.

16 TUFF SHED, INC. and
17
18
19
20

DOES 1 through 50,

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 5:16-CV-01728-PSG-KK
CLASS ACTION
Judge: Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
Courtroom: 800 (Roybal)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION FOR
REMAND OF CASE TO
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT
FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Complaint Filed: July 1, 2016
(Riverside County Superior Court,
Case No. RIC1608233)
Removal Date: August 11, 2016

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR REMAND

5:16-CV-01728-PSG-KK

1

Plaintiff Tommy E. Castillo (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Tuff Shed, Inc.

2 (“Defendant”) (collectively the “Parties”) have filed a Joint Stipulation for Order
3 Remanding Case to California Superior Court for Riverside County.
4

Upon consideration of the Parties’ joint stipulation, IT IS HEREBY

5 ORDERED that this case shall be, and hereby is, remanded to California Superior
6 Court for County of Riverside for further proceedings, without prejudice to
7 Defendant to seek federal court jurisdiction should additional evidence be
8 discovered through litigation that would support grounds for removal.
9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any court hearings and pending deadlines

10 are taken off calendar in this Court.
11

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear its own costs and fees

12 in connection with the removal of the action and this remand.
13 IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
14 September ____, 2016
15
16

Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
Judge of the United District Court

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR REMAND

5:16-CV-01728-PSG-KK