Timothy Johnson v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
23
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, The Court having approved the parties Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation of Remand. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 22 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, General Civil Section
PAUL SACHELARI, CSBN 230082
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8933
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: paul.sachelari@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTERN DIVISION
15
16
TIMOTHY JOHNSON,
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation
of Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-
27
28
) No. 5:16-cv-01753-KS
)
)
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further
///
1
proceedings consistent with the Stipulation of Remand.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: February 16, 2017
HON. KAREN L. STEVENSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?