Timothy Johnson v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, The Court having approved the parties Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation of Remand. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 22 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, General Civil Section PAUL SACHELARI, CSBN 230082 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear St., Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8933 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: paul.sachelari@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 15 16 TIMOTHY JOHNSON, 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation of Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above- 27 28 ) No. 5:16-cv-01753-KS ) ) ) JUDGMENT OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further /// 1 proceedings consistent with the Stipulation of Remand. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: February 16, 2017 HON. KAREN L. STEVENSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?