Landon Ryan Johnson v. D. Asuncion

Filing 30

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 20 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

LANDON RYAN JOHNSON,

)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
)
)
D. ASUNCION, Warden,
)
Respondent.
)
_________________________________ )

NO. EDCV 16-1976-JLS (KS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas

19

Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United

20

States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

21

Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.

22

R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to

23

which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the

24

findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.

25

\\

26

\\

27

\\

28

\\

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment
shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: November 20, 2017

_____________________________________
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE