Darlene Andrea Reffel v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
26
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA") in the amount of TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/cents ($2,100.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation 24 . (afe)
WILLIAM M. KUNTZ # 153052
Attorney at Law
2 4780 Arlington Avenue
Riverside, CA 92504
3 (951) 343-3400
Fax (951) 343-4004
4 E-Mail: KuntzSSlaw @sbcglobal.net
Attorney for Plaintiff
1
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTERN DIVISION
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DARLENE ANDREA REFFEL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, Acting )
Commissioner of Social Security
)
Administration,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________ )
CASE NO.: EDCV16-01985-AS
[PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING
EAJA FEES
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access
to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees (“Stipulation”),
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the
21
Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA”) in the amount of TWO THOUSAND ONE
22
HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/cents ($2,100.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §
23
2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation.
24
25
DATED: December 5, 2017
26
/ s / Alka Sagar
__________________________________
HONORABLE ALKA SAGAR
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
1
28
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to
Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for
Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to
be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?