North American Wellness Center Holdings LLC v. Temecula Valley Real Estate, Inc. et al
Filing
126
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Pursuant to the Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Count 1, Violation of the Sherman Act, § 1; Count 2, Violation of the Sherman Act, 67; 2; Count 4, Securities Violations under 15 U.S.C. § 78(j); Count 5, Securities Violations under SEC Rule 10b-5; and Count 6, Securities Violations under § 9(A)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice to re-filing in state court. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
1
United States District Court
Central District of California
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SEPT 29, 2017
North American Wellness Center
Holdings LLC,
Plaintiff,
B
H
ED 16-CV-2010-VAP-DTB
v.
Temecula Valley Real Estate, Inc., et
al.
Defendants.
Judgment
United States District Court
Central District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to the Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss filed
herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Count 1, Violation of the
Sherman Act, § 1; Count 2, Violation of the Sherman Act, § 2; Count 4, Securities
Violations under 15 U.S.C. § 78(j); Count 5, Securities Violations under SEC Rule
10b-5; and Count 6, Securities Violations under § 9(A)(4) of the Securities Exchange
Act in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
All remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice to re-filing in state court. The
Court orders that such judgment be entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated:
_______________________
Virginia A. Phillips
Chief United States District Judge
9/29/17
24
25
26
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?