North American Wellness Center Holdings LLC v. Temecula Valley Real Estate, Inc. et al

Filing 126

JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Pursuant to the Order granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Count 1, Violation of the Sherman Act, § 1; Count 2, Violation of the Sherman Act,  67; 2; Count 4, Securities Violations under 15 U.S.C. § 78(j); Count 5, Securities Violations under SEC Rule 10b-5; and Count 6, Securities Violations under § 9(A)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice to re-filing in state court. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

Download PDF
1 United States District Court Central District of California 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SEPT 29, 2017 North American Wellness Center Holdings LLC, Plaintiff, B H ED 16-CV-2010-VAP-DTB v. Temecula Valley Real Estate, Inc., et al. Defendants. Judgment United States District Court Central District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Pursuant to the Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Count 1, Violation of the Sherman Act, § 1; Count 2, Violation of the Sherman Act, § 2; Count 4, Securities Violations under 15 U.S.C. § 78(j); Count 5, Securities Violations under SEC Rule 10b-5; and Count 6, Securities Violations under § 9(A)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice to re-filing in state court. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: _______________________ Virginia A. Phillips Chief United States District Judge 9/29/17 24 25 26 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?