Gustavo Castro Zamudio v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
31
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation 29 is accepted. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 26 is DENIED. 3. Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Ju dgment is GRANTED and the decision of the ALJ is AFFIRMED. 4. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. 5. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. 6. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. (ch)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EASTERN DIVISION
11
12
GUSTAVO CASTRO ZAMUDIO,
13
,
14
15
16
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. ED CV 16-2203-JFW (PLA)
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the other records on
19
file herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and plaintiff’s Objections to the
20
Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of
21
the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the
22
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
23
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:
24
1.
The Report and Recommendation is accepted.
25
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
26
3.
Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and the decision of the
27
28
ALJ is affirmed.
4.
Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed.
1
5.
Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order.
2
6.
The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record.
3
4
DATED: October 25, 2017
___________________________________
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?