George Loya v. Western Riverside Council of Governments et al

Filing 113

JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 111 , it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that Judgment shall be and hereby is entered in favor of Renovate America, Inc. and against Plaintiffs on Counts IV, V, and VI in the Amended Co mplaint. Plaintiffs shall have no right to relief against Renovate America, Inc. by reason of anything stated in Counts IV, V, and VI in Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. The Court hereby determines that there is no just reason for delay in enterin g judgment on these claims as to Renovate America, Inc. because Plaintiffs' remaining claims have been remanded to state court. [This document relates to: Richardson, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-08943 AB (KKx)] (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION

11

IN RE HERO LOAN LITIGATION

Lead Case No. 5:16-cv-02478 AB (KKx)

12
13
14
15
16 This Document Relates To:
17
Richardson, et al. v. County of Los
Angeles, et al., Case No. 2:16-cv18
08943-AB (KKx)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Courtroom: 7B
Judge:
Hon. André Birotte Jr.

1

On July 17, 2017, the Court granted in full Defendant County of Los Angeles’

2 (“L.A. County”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint pursuant to
3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), with prejudice as to all claims against L.A.
4 County. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that Judgment shall
5 be and hereby is entered in favor of L.A. County and against Plaintiffs on all claims.
6 Plaintiffs shall have no right to relief against L.A. County by reason of anything stated
7 in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint [Docket No. 51].
8

In the same July 17, 2017 Order [Docket No. 108], the Court partially granted

9 Defendant Renovate America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended
10 Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Specifically, as to
11 Renovate America, Inc., the Court dismissed with prejudice all of Plaintiffs’ claims
12 against Renovate America, Inc. brought under or in connection with the Truth in
13 Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and the Home Ownership Equity Protection
14 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1639 et seq. (collectively, Counts IV, V, and VI in the Amended
15 Complaint).
16

Accordingly, it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that Judgment shall be

17 and hereby is entered in favor of Renovate America, Inc. and against Plaintiffs on
18 Counts IV, V, and VI in the Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs shall have no right to
19 relief against Renovate America, Inc. by reason of anything stated in Counts IV, V,
20 and VI in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. The Court hereby determines that there is
21 no just reason for delay in entering judgment on these claims as to Renovate America,
22 Inc. because Plaintiffs’ remaining claims have been remanded to state court.
23
24
25

Dated: October 13, 2017
HON. ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
–1–