Keana Fisher v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company of Los Angeles

Filing 36

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: 1. That this case is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court for the Stateof California, County of San Mateo, Case no. 16 CIV01521. 2. Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings #27 is DISMISSED AS MOOT, vacated, and taken off calendar. 3. Plaintiffs Motion for Remand #29 is DISMISSED AS MOOT,vacated, and taken off calendar. 4. No sanctions or attorneys fees related to the removal of this case or the remand of this case or the proceedings in this Court are awarded to any party. Each party shall bear its own costs.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13 KEANA FISHER, Individually and on

Case No. 5:16-cv-02479-ODW-KK

14

HON. OTIS D, WRIGHT, II

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

15
16

Plaintiffs,
vs.

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT

ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR

17 COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES, LLC,
18

Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT
1065415.01/LA

1

Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Remand Case to State Court, the

2 Court hereby orders as follows:
3

1. That this case is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court for the State

4 of California, County of San Mateo.
5

2. Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 27) is

6 DISMISSED AS MOOT, vacated, and taken off calendar.
7

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (ECF No. 29) is DISMISSED AS MOOT,

8 vacated, and taken off calendar.
9

4. No sanctions or attorneys’ fees related to the removal of this case or the

10 remand of this case or the proceedings in this Court are awarded to any party. Each
11 party shall bear its own costs.
12
13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

January 9, 2017
Hon. Otis D. Wright, II
Judge, United States District Court

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT
1065415.01/LA

-2-