Edward Jackson v. Bank of America

Filing 27

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL IN FAVOR OF BANK OF AMERICA NA by Judge Jesus G. Bernal Re Order on Motion to Dismiss 23 : GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motion of Defendant to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is granted without leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to Defendant BANK OF AMERICA NA. Plaintiff is to recover nothing from BANK OF AMERICA NA. (ad)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — EASTERN DIVISION

10 EDWARD JACKSON,
Plaintiff,

11
12

Case No. 5:16-cv-02522-JGB-SP
Hon. Jesus G. Bernal
Ctrm. 1

vs.

13 BANK OF AMERICA, and DOES 1
through 20 inclusive,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL IN
FAVOR OF BANK OF AMERICA,
N.A.
Date: May 15, 2017
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Ctrm.: 1
Action Filed: December 6, 2016
Trial Date:
None Set

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
70001.0415/10762255.1

Case No. 5:16-cv-02522-JGB-SP
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL IN FAVOR OF BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

1

The motion of Defendant BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (“Defendant”) to

2 dismiss the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff EDWARD JACKSON pursuant
3 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon
4 which relief can be granted was set for hearing on May 15, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in
5 Courtroom 1 of the above-entitled Court. On May 9, 2017, the Honorable Jesus G.
6 Bernal found the matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and
7 vacated the May 15, 2017 hearing.
8

The Court, after considering the moving papers, and any opposition and reply

9 thereto and the arguments therein, granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s
10 First Amended Complaint without leave to amend and dismissed the action with
11 prejudice.
12

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

13

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the

14 motion of Defendant to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is granted
15 without leave to amend.
16

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the

17 case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to Defendant BANK OF
18 AMERICA, N.A. Plaintiff is to recover nothing from BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
19
20
21 DATED: June 8, 2017
HON. JESUS G. BERNAL
JESUS BERNAL
N
UNITED
E
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
70001.0415/10762255.1

Case No. 5:16-cv-02522-JGB-SP
1
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL IN FAVOR OF BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.