James R. Cravens v. Sterigenics International, Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 7 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plainti ff James R. Cravens ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Sterigenics U.S., LLC (erroneously sued as "STERIGENICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.") ("Sterigenics") (collectively, the "Parties"): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff&# 039;s Complaint in the above- referenced action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation, each party shall bear their own respective attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JS-6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAMES R. CRAVENS,

CASE NO. 5:16-cv-02542-ODW-SP

Plaintiff,

[San Bernardino Superior Court Case
No. CIVDS1611305]

STERIGENICS INTERNATIONAL,
14 INC., and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

12
13

vs.

15
16
17

Defendants.

Complaint Filed: July 14, 2016
Complaint Served: November 10, 2016

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action

3 with Prejudice (the “Stipulation”) filed by Plaintiff James R. Cravens (“Plaintiff”)
4 and Defendant Sterigenics U.S., LLC (erroneously sued as “STERIGENICS
5 INTERNATIONAL, INC.”) (“Sterigenics”) (collectively, the “Parties”):
6
7

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-

8 referenced action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
9 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation, each party shall bear
10 their own respective attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action.
11
12 IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14 Dated:_February 22, 2017__
15

_________________________________
HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE