Amber Wallisa v. City of Hesparia et al

Filing 145

ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEPUTY DEFENDANTS AND VACATING TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE DATES AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES RE PARTIES' NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT 144 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court hereby vaca tes the Trial date and the final Pre-Trial Conference date. There Court hereby vacates its Order dated March 25, 2019 143 as being moot. To the extent there are any other Trial-related deadlines or requirements in this. The clerk shall administratively close the case pending submission of final approval of the settlement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMBER WALLISA, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent 12 STEPHEN SCHENCK, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 CITY OF HESPERIA, a municipal corporation; COUNTY OF SAN 16 BERNARDINO, a municipal corporation; TOWN OF APPLE 17 VALLEY, a municipal corporation; JONATHAN FLORES, individually 18 and his official capacity as a deputy Sheriff for the COUNTY OF SAN 19 BERNARDINO Sheriff's Department; DOES 1-10, inclusive; individually and 20 in their capacities as law enforcement agents and/or personnel for the 21 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Sheriff's Department; DOES 11-20, 22 inclusive; individually and in their capacities as law enforcement agents 23 and/or personnel for the TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY Police Department; 24 DOES 21-30, inclusive; individually and in their capacities as law 25 enforcement agents and/or personnel for the CITY OF HESPERIA Police 26 Department. 27 Case No. 5:16-cv-2638 FMO (KKx) [Hon. Fernando M. Olguin, Dist. Judge; Hon. Kenly K. Kato, M. Judge] [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEPUTY DEFENDANTS AND VACATING TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE DATES AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES RE PARTIES’ NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT Complaint Filed: Dec.27, 2016 Final Pre-Trial Conf.: April 8, 2019 Trial Date: April 23, 2019 Defendants. 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS & VACATING TRIAL 1 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and pursuant to 2 the Court’s inherent and statutory authority, including but not limited to the Court’s 3 authority under the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the United 4 States District Court, Central District of California Local Rules; after due 5 consideration of all of the relevant pleadings, papers, and records in this action; and 6 upon such other evidence or argument as was presented to the Court; Good Cause 7 appearing therefor, and in furtherance of the interests of justice, the Court hereby 8 Orders: 9 1. The Court hereby takes judicial notice of the fact that the parties have 10 reached a conditional settlement of the entire action. 11 2. The Court hereby vacates the Trial date and the final Pre-Trial 12 Conference date. There Court hereby vacates its Order dated March 25, 2019 [Dkt. 13 Doc. 143] as being moot. To the extent there are any other Trial-related deadlines 14 or requirements in this action, the parties are hereby excused from such and such are 15 hereby vacated. 16 3. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice plaintiff’s claim for 17 Excessive Force pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in violation of the Fourth 18 Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by plaintiff AMBER WALLISA against 19 defendants JONATHAN FLORES, SPENCER WILT, and KENT WATSON 20 [Second Claim for Relief] – in its entirety, and as to the Deputy Defendants. 21 4. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice plaintiff’s claim for 22 Wrongful Death pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in violation of the Fourth and 23 Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by plaintiff AMBER 24 WALLISA against defendants JONATHAN FLORES, SPENCER WILT, and 25 KENT WATSON [Third Claim for Relief] – in its entirety, and as to the Deputy 26 Defendants. 27 5. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice plaintiff’s claim for 28 Violations of Plaintiff's Civil Rights to Familial Relationship pursuant to 42 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS & VACATING TRIAL 1 U.S.C. § 1983 in violation of the Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution 2 by plaintiff AMBER WALLISA against defendants JONATHAN FLORES, 3 SPENCER WILT, and KENT WATSON [Fourth Claim for Relief] – in its entirety, 4 and as to the Deputy Defendants. 5 6. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice plaintiff’s claim for 6 Violations of Fourth Amendment – Failure to Render Medical Care/Denial of 7 Medical Care pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in violation of the Fourth Amendment 8 to the U.S. Constitution by plaintiff AMBER WALLISA against defendants 9 JONATHAN FLORES, SPENCER WILT, and KENT WATSON [Sixth Claim for 10 Relief] – in its entirety, and as to the Deputy Defendants. 11 7. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice plaintiff’s claim for 12 Wrongful Death - Negligence pursuant to California law (including Cal. Gov. 13 Code §§ 377.60 & 377.61) by plaintiff AMBER WALLISA against defendants 14 JONATHAN FLORES, SPENCER WILT, and KENT WATSON [Seventh Claim 15 for Relief] – as to the Deputy Defendants only. 16 8. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice plaintiff’s claim for 17 Violation of Decedent's Rights to Enjoy Civil Rights pursuant to California Civil 18 Code § 52.1 (Bane Act) by plaintiff AMBER WALLISA against defendants 19 JONATHAN FLORES, SPENCER WILT, and KENT WATSON [Eighth Claim for 20 Relief] – as to the Deputy Defendants only. 21 9. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice plaintiff’s claim for 22 Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress – Survival claim, pursuant to 23 California law by plaintiff AMBER WALLISA against defendants JONATHAN 24 FLORES, SPENCER WILT, and KENT WATSON [Ninth Claim for Relief] – as to 25 the Deputy Defendants only. 26 10. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice plaintiff’s claim for 27 Assault and Battery – Survival Claim, pursuant to California law (including Cal. 28 Gov. Code § 820) by plaintiff AMBER WALLISA against defendants JONATHAN 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS & VACATING TRIAL 1 FLORES, SPENCER WILT, and KENT WATSON [Tenth Claim for Relief] – as to 2 the Deputy Defendants only. 3 11. To the extent that plaintiff alleges any other claims against the Deputy 4 Defendants in this action, plaintiff hereby stipulates (and the signatory parties 5 stipulate) to dismiss with prejudice any and all such claims and causes of action. 6 The Court hereby takes judicial notice of the fact that the parties have stipulated that 7 defendant the County of San Bernardino shall remain a defendant in this action until 8 the conditional settlement of the parties has been finalized and the parties request a 9 further dismissal from this Court. 10 12. The Court hereby further orders that in the event that the 11 aforementioned conditional settlement is not approved by the County of San 12 Bernardino’s Board of Supervisors, the parties have stipulated and the Court hereby 13 orders that – notwithstanding any other/prior court order or stipulation – plaintiff 14 shall be permitted to file an amended pleading withdrawing this stipulation and 15 reinstating the Deputy Defendants as defendants in this action, and all of the 16 formerly dismissed claims against such defendants as stated herein above shall be 17 reinstated, so that this partial dismissal with prejudice shall be deemed set aside and 18 vacated. 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS & VACATING TRIAL 1 13. Furthermore, the Court acknowledges the parties’ agreement to 2 mutually waive and release all costs, court fees, and attorneys’ fees arising out of 3 this litigation between these parties thereto as to the aforementioned dismissed 4 claims. 5 14. The clerk shall administratively close the case pending submission of 6 final approval of the settlement. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 2, 2019 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA /s/ Hon. Fernando M. Olguin, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE By: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS & VACATING TRIAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?