Luis Ranero et al v. County of San Bernardino et al

Filing 80

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 79 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). This Court shall retain jurisdiction over matters relating to the Bankruptcy Estate of Plaintiff Luis Ranero to the extent that such matters pertain to the settlement funds in this case. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LUIS RANERO; and JASMIN 10 RANERO, in each case individually, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 Case No. 5:16-cv-02655 CBM (DTBx) [Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [JS-6] 14 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; 15 and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 16 Defendants 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1Case No. 5:16-cv-02655-CBM (DTBx) ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be dismissed in its 2 entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). 3 This Court shall retain jurisdiction over matters relating to the Bankruptcy Estate of 4 Plaintiff Luis Ranero to the extent that such matters pertain to the settlement funds 5 in this case. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: June 14, 2019 10 11 ___________________________________ Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case No. 5:16-cv-02655-CBM (DTBx) ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?