Luis Ranero et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
Filing
80
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 79 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). This Court shall retain jurisdiction over matters relating to the Bankruptcy Estate of Plaintiff Luis Ranero to the extent that such matters pertain to the settlement funds in this case. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
LUIS RANERO; and JASMIN
10 RANERO, in each case individually,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
13
Case No. 5:16-cv-02655 CBM (DTBx)
[Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall]
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [JS-6]
14 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO;
15 and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
16
Defendants
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1Case No. 5:16-cv-02655-CBM (DTBx)
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be dismissed in its
2 entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1).
3 This Court shall retain jurisdiction over matters relating to the Bankruptcy Estate of
4 Plaintiff Luis Ranero to the extent that such matters pertain to the settlement funds
5 in this case.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9 Dated: June 14, 2019
10
11
___________________________________
Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Case No. 5:16-cv-02655-CBM (DTBx)
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?