Sam Ostayan v. State of California Franchise Tax Board et al
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna Remanding the Case to Superior Court County of Riverside, Case number RIC 1612788. The scheduling conference scheduled for April 3, 2017, at 11:30 a.m. is taken off calendar. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (mba)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SANDRA R. BROWN
Acting United States Attorney
THOMAS D. COKER
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
ANDREW T. PRIBE (CA SBN 254904)
Assistant United States Attorney
Federal Building, Suite 7211
300 North Los Angeles Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-6551
Facsimile: (213) 894-0115
E-mail: andrew.t.pribe@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States of America
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTERN DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JS-6
Case No.: 5:16-cv-2657 JVS(KKx)
SAM OSTAYAN,
Plaintiff,
Order remanding the case the
Superior Court of the State of
California for Riverside County
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD; THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,
INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE; ANY AND ALL
PERSONS CLAIMING ANY
RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST IN
OR TO THE PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 22612
INSPIRATION POINT, CANYON
LAKE, CALIFORNIA; AND DOES
1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE
Defendants
1
1
2
3
Based on the stipulation of Sam Ostayan, Plaintiff, and the United
States of America, Defendant, it is ordered that:
1.
The case is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of
4
California for the County of Riverside. The case number of the proceeding in
5
state court is RIC1612788.
6
7
8
2.
The scheduling conference scheduled for April 3, 2017, at 11:30
a.m. is taken off calendar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Dated: March 28, 2017
________________________________
12
JAMES V. SELNA
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?