Sam Ostayan v. State of California Franchise Tax Board et al

Filing 9

ORDER by Judge James V. Selna Remanding the Case to Superior Court County of Riverside, Case number RIC 1612788. The scheduling conference scheduled for April 3, 2017, at 11:30 a.m. is taken off calendar. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (mba)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SANDRA R. BROWN Acting United States Attorney THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division ANDREW T. PRIBE (CA SBN 254904) Assistant United States Attorney Federal Building, Suite 7211 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-6551 Facsimile: (213) 894-0115 E-mail: andrew.t.pribe@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States of America 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JS-6 Case No.: 5:16-cv-2657 JVS(KKx) SAM OSTAYAN, Plaintiff, Order remanding the case the Superior Court of the State of California for Riverside County v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; ANY AND ALL PERSONS CLAIMING ANY RIGHT, TITLE OR INTEREST IN OR TO THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 22612 INSPIRATION POINT, CANYON LAKE, CALIFORNIA; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE Defendants 1 1 2 3 Based on the stipulation of Sam Ostayan, Plaintiff, and the United States of America, Defendant, it is ordered that: 1. The case is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of 4 California for the County of Riverside. The case number of the proceeding in 5 state court is RIC1612788. 6 7 8 2. The scheduling conference scheduled for April 3, 2017, at 11:30 a.m. is taken off calendar. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Dated: March 28, 2017 ________________________________ 12 JAMES V. SELNA 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?