Domonic Antonio Cooper v. Deputy Roche et al

Filing 32

MINUTES (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. On June 12, 2017, the Court notified plaintiff that defendant Dr. Kumbhani was no longer an employee of the County of San Bernardino, and as such the U.S. Marshals Service had not been able t o serve him with the Summons and First Amended Complaint in this action. Plaintiff was ordered to furnish the Court and the U.S.Marshals Service with alternate service information for defendant Kumbhani no later than July 12, 2017. To date, plaintiff has not done so. Accordingly, NO LATER THAN AUGUST 14, 2017, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why defendant Kumbhani should not be dismissed from this action. (ch)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL Case No.: ED CV 17-38-PSG (PLA) Title: Date: July 31, 2017 Domonic Antonio Cooper v. Deputy Roche, et al. PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PAUL L. ABRAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE N/A Court Reporter / Recorder Christianna Howard Deputy Clerk ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE PROCEEDINGS: N/A Tape No. NONE (IN CHAMBERS) On June 12, 2017, the Court notified plaintiff that defendant Dr. Kumbhani was no longer an employee of the County of San Bernardino, and as such the U.S. Marshals Service had not been able to serve him with the Summons and First Amended Complaint in this action. Plaintiff was ordered to furnish the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service with alternate service information for defendant Kumbhani no later than July 12, 2017. To date, plaintiff has not done so. Accordingly, no later than August 14, 2017, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why defendant Kumbhani should not be dismissed from this action. cc: Domonic Antonio Cooper, pro se Adam Lee Miederhoff, San Bernardino County Counsel Initials of Deputy Clerk CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL ch Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?