Joshua A. Peerman v. Raymond Madden
Filing
24
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Percy Anderson 18 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Petitioners request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (twdb) .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EASTERN DIVISION
11
12
JOSHUA A. PEERMAN,
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
15
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden,
Respondent.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. EDCV 17-00047-PA (JDE)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
18
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the
20
other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the
21
United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo
22
review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which
23
24
25
objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
26
27
28
(1) Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED; and
//
1
2
(2) Judgment shall be entered denying the petition and dismissing this
action with prejudice.
3
4
Dated: August 29, 2017
5
______________________________
PERCY ANDERSON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?