Champan R. Washington v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 33

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, as to WELLS FARGO and that a Judgment of Dismissal be entered in favor of WELLS FARGO and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff is awarded nothing in this action against WELLS FARGO. (jp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Jeffrey S. Gerardo #146508
Steven M. Dailey #163857
KUTAK ROCK LLP
Suite 1500
5 Park Plaza
Irvine, CA 92614-8595
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB [erroneously
sued as “Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Successor By
Merger with Wachovia Mortgage, FSB;
Formerly Known As World Savings Bank, FSB
Its Successors and/or Assigns”]

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

EASTERN DIVISION

13
14

CHAMPAN R. WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19
20

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
successor by merger with
Wachovia Mortgage, FSB;
formerly known as World Savings
Bank, FSB Its Successors and/or
Assigns; and DOES 1 – 10,
inclusive,

Case No. 5:17-cv-00054-JFW (DTBx)
Assigned to
District Judge: Hon. John F. Walter
Courtroom: 7A
Magistrate Judge: Hon. David T. Bristow
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

Date Filed:

January 12, 2017

Defendants.

21
22

On March 10, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting WELLS FARGO

23

BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA MORTGAGE,

24

FSB’s [“WELLS FARGO’s”] unopposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff CHAMPAN

25

R. WASHINGTON’s Complaint. On April 21, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff’s

26

Motion to Vacate Judgment of Dismissal but expressly ordered Plaintiff to file a

27

First Amended Complaint on or before May 1, 2017. Plaintiff did not timely file a

28
K UTAK R OCK LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
IRVINE

4830-2411-0920.1
14617-963

-1JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

17-cv-00054-JFW (DTBx)

1

First Amended Complaint and, on May 4, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff’s

2

Complaint DISMISSED with prejudice.

3

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that

4

the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, as to WELLS FARGO and

5

that a Judgment of Dismissal be entered in favor of WELLS FARGO and against

6

Plaintiff. Plaintiff is awarded nothing in this action against WELLS FARGO.

7
8
9

Dated: May 10, 2017
Hon. John F. Walter

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
K UTAK R OCK LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
IRVINE

4830-2411-0920.1
14617-963

-2JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

17-cv-00054-JFW (DTBx)