Charlie Lee Dunn v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 19 . The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jlo)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Denise Bourgeois Haley Attorney at Law: 143709 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-5491 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Charlie Lee Dunn 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CHARLIE LEE DUNN, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) Case No.: 5:17-cv-00092-VBF-KK ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: 10/6/2017 ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE KENLY KIYA KATO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 -1- 1 2 3 4 DATE: October 2, 2017 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Denise Bourgeois Haley BY: __________________ Denise Bourgeois Haley Attorney for plaintiff Charlie Lee Dunn 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR CASE NUMBER 5:17-CV-00092-VBF-KK I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on October 2, 2017. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. /s/ Denise Bourgeois Haley _______________________________ Denise Bourgeois Haley Attorneys for Plaintiff ___________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?