Victor H. Clarke v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 15

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The Complaint is dismissed as to Wells Fargo and Quality, as toa ll causes of action, with prejudice; Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Wells Fargo Quality; and Plaintiff, Victor H. Clarke will recover nothing in this action from either defendant Wells Fargo nor Quality. (bp)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Victor H. Clarke, Plaintiff, 12 13 CASE NO.: 5:17-cv-00118-RGK-SP JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL v. 14 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, [Assigned to the Hon. R. Gary Klausner] INC. aka WELLS FARGO BANK, 15 LTD; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 THRU 16 50, inclusive, Defendants. 17 18 19 20 On April 3, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to Dismiss 21 the Complaint, filed by defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by 22 merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, 23 f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB, erroneously sued as “WELLS FARGO HOME 24 MORTGAGE, INC. aka WELLS FARGO BANK, LTD” (“Wells Fargo”) 25 dismissing the Complaint in its entirety, without leave to amend. On April 13, 2017, the Court entered a further order dismissing Quality 26 27 Loan Service Corporation (“Quality”) for the reasons set forth in Wells Fargo’s 28 motion to dismiss. 93000/FR2155/01752941-2 1 CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-00118-RGK-SP [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 Accordingly: 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 3 1. The Complaint is dismissed as to Wells Fargo and Quality, as to all 4 causes of action, with prejudice; 5 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Wells Fargo and Quality; 3. Plaintiff, Victor H. Clarke will recover nothing in this action from 6 and 7 8 either defendant Wells Fargo nor Quality. 9 10 11 DATED: 6/22/17 12 HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR2155/01752941-2 2 CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-00118-RGK-SP [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to 3 this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 301 N. Lake 4 Avenue, Suite 1100, Pasadena, California 91101-2459. 5 On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: 6 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 7 on the interested parties in said case as follows: 8 Served By Means Other Than the Court’s CM/ECF System: 9 Plaintiff Pro Se: Victor H. Clarke 45675 Sugarloaf Mountain Trail Indian Wells, CA 92210 10 11 12 COURTESY COPY Attorneys for Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation: 13 14 Tel.: 619.645-7711 ǀ Fax: 619.568.3518 15 Email: dgoulding@qualityloan.com jmolteni@qualityloan.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 Julie O. Molteni, Esq. QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION 411 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101  BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence by mailing. Under that same practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage fully prepaid at Pasadena, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 22 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the 23 office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service was 24 made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on June 20, 2017. 25 26 Carol Goodwin (Type or Print Name) /s/ Carol Goodwin (Signature of Declarant) 27 28 93000/FR2155/01752941-2 CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00118-RGK-SP CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?