SCG Atlas Marquesssa LLC v. Concetta Germain et al

Filing 6

ORDER REMANDING Case to Superior Court of California, County of Riverside by Judge Dale S. Fischer. This matter was removed from state court on January 27, 2017. The complaint is a state law unlawful detainer complaint and doe3s not state a federal c ause of action. While the notice of removal claims federal question jurisdiction, federal jurisdiction is based on the plaintiff's complaint and not on any federal counterclaims or defenses that a defendant might assert. See Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc. 535 U.S. 826, 830-32 (2002). This Case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside. Case number MVC1604652 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (bp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL JS 6 Case No. Title Date EDCV 17-154 DSF (DTBx) 1/31/17 SCG Atlas Marquessa LLC v. Concetta Germain Present: The Honorable DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge Debra Plato Deputy Clerk Not Present Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order REMANDING Case to Superior Court of California, County of Riverside This matter was removed from state court on January 27, 2017. The complaint is a state law unlawful detainer complaint and does not state a federal cause of action. While the notice of removal claims federal question jurisdiction, federal jurisdiction is based on the plaintiff’s complaint and not on any federal counterclaims or defenses that a defendant might assert. See Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc., 535 U.S. 826, 830-32 (2002). The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside. IT IS SO ORDERED. CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?