Aaron Raiser v. City of Temecula et al

Filing 60

ORDER ACCEPTING SECOND INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 57 . (1) Defendant State of California's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant State of California are dismissed without leave to amend; and (2) Plaintiff's Motions to Amend are DENIED. (See order for details) (hr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

Case No. ED CV 17-00217 RGK (RAO)

AARON RAISER,

CITY OF TEMECULA, et al.,
Defendants.

15

ORDER ACCEPTING SECOND
INTERIM REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Defendant State of

18

California’s motion to dismiss, Plaintiff Aaron Raiser’s motions to amend, all of the

19

other records and files herein, and the Second Interim Report and Recommendation

20

of United States Magistrate Judge (“Second Interim Report”). The time for filing

21

objections to the Second Interim Report has passed, and no objections have been

22

filed.

23

recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and

1

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

2

(1) Defendant State of California’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and

3

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant State of California are dismissed

4

without leave to amend; and

5

(2) Plaintiff’s Motions to Amend are DENIED.

6
7

DATED: February 08, 2018

8
9

R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2