Marcelino Zepeda Castillo v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 23

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re: Stipulation for Attorney Fees 22 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 James Pi, Calif. Bar No. 188880 LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C. 60 East 42nd Street Suite 520 New York, NY 10165 Phone (212) 677-6801 Fax (646) 273-2196 Email: fedcourt@binderlawfirm.com 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 MARCELINO ZEPEDA CASTILLO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant. ) No.: 5:17-CV-00236-SS ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 16 17 18 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal 19 Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall 20 be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND 21 DOLLARS ($5,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of 22 FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above- 23 referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury’s 24 Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Any payment 25 shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dated: 2/20/18 /S/ Suzanne H. Segal United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?