Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Wrightwood Inn, Inc.
Filing
19
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew.The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cour t, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff/s to show cause in writing no later than July 20, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept o ne of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant/s' Answer/Response to the Complaint/Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendant/s OR appropria te request for dismissal of this action. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plain tiff/s is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all named parties in this action who have been served but have not yet appeared. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions including the dismissal of this action. Additionally, the Order to Show Cause issued on May 19, 2017 9 is hereby discharged in favor of this order. (jre)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
5:17-cv-00242-RSWL-DTBx
Title
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Wrightwood Inn, Inc.
Present: The
Honorable
Date
July 14, 2017
RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior U.S. District Judge
Joseph Remigio
n/a
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action
diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary,
plaintiff/s must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations
affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1.
The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected
below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff /s to show cause in writing no
later than July 20, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following,
if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently:
•
Defendant/s’ Answer/Response to the Complaint/Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Default
on defendant/s OR appropriate request for dismissal of this action.
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand
submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a
response by plaintiff/s is due.
Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all named parties in this action who have been
served but have not yet appeared.
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions including the
dismissal of this action.
Additionally, the Order to Show Cause issued on May 19, 2017 [9] is hereby discharged in favor
of this order.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
00
JRE
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?