Anthony Wadell Moneyham v. United States of America et al

Filing 31

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/24/2017. (dts)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANTHONY WADELL MONEYHAM, Case No. EDCV 17-329-VBF (KK) Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Respondent. 15 16 17 On February 14, 2017, Plaintiff constructively filed a Complaint against 18 defendants United States of America, Escamilla, Herrera, Jimenez, Marroquin, 19 Olmos, Price, and Valencia (“Defendants”) pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown 20 Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics (“Bivens”), 403 U.S. 388, 91 S. Ct. 21 1999, 29 L. Ed. 2d 619 (1971). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt”) 1. 22 On September 20, 2017, Defendants filed a fifth Ex Parte Application to 23 Extend Time to File Answer. Dkt. 28. On September 21, 2017, the Court granted 24 Defendants’ Application and granted Defendants until October 13, 2017 to respond 25 to the Complaint. Dkt. 29. As of this date, Defendants have not complied with the 26 October 13, 2017 Order. 27 28 Accordingly, Defendants are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, on or before October 24, 2017, why Defendants have failed to file any responsive 1 pleading. Defendants are cautioned failure to timely respond to this Order may 2 result in entry of default, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), and/or 3 sanctions. 4 5 6 7 Dated: October 17, 2017 HONORABLE KENLY KIYA KATO United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?