Melissa Beth Bush v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 16

JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. The Court having approved the parties Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrently with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 15 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

Download PDF
7 SANDRA R. BROWN Acting United States Attorney DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Civil Division ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, General Civil Section MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT, CSBN 280890 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-1545 Telephone: (415) 977-8985 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: Michael.Marriott@ssa.gov 8 Attorneys for Defendant 1 2 3 4 5 6 JS-6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 EASTERN DIVISION 12 13 MELISSA BETH BUSH, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 21 22 ) ) Case No. 5:17-cv-00348-DTB ) ) ) JUDGMENT OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand 23 Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment 24 (“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the lodging of the within 25 Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 26 DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of 27 Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 28 26 DATED: July 25, 2017 CHIEF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?