Melissa Beth Bush v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Filing
16
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. The Court having approved the parties Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrently with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 15 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
7
SANDRA R. BROWN
Acting United States Attorney
DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Civil Division
ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE
Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, General Civil Section
MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT, CSBN 280890
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105-1545
Telephone: (415) 977-8985
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: Michael.Marriott@ssa.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendant
1
2
3
4
5
6
JS-6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
EASTERN DIVISION
12
13
MELISSA BETH BUSH,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
Defendant.
21
22
)
) Case No. 5:17-cv-00348-DTB
)
)
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
23
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
24
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the lodging of the within
25
Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
26
DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of
27
Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
28
26
DATED: July 25, 2017
CHIEF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?