Rodney H Dixon v. NPG Music Publishing, LLC et al
Filing
52
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On June 6, 2017, the Court granted Defendants motion to dismiss without leave to amend and Defendants motion to deem Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. (ECF Nos. 30, 39.) 1. Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defe ndants, and his claims against Defendants are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice; 2. Defendants shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill of costs. 3. Plaintiff is a vexatious litigant. 4. Plaintiff, or any person acting on hi s behalf, must first obtain written authorization from a magistrate judge before initiating a new action against Comerica Bank and Trust, N.A. as Personal Representative for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson; NPG Music Publishing, LLC; NPG Records, Inc.; or any other entity controlled by the Personal Representative that is related to (1) a contract, of any type, to which Prince was a party, or (2) any of the 965 songs included in the April 4, 2014 transfer of rights (the Exclusive Songwriter Ag reement). Plaintiff will be allowed to file a complaint if a magistrate judge finds that the proposed complaint is not frivolous and not duplicative of any claim Plaintiff has already filed in state or federal court. If the magistrate judge allows th e filing but determines, based on the pleadings and any evidence provided by the parties, that there is no reasonable probability Plaintiff will prevail in the litigation, the magistrate may order Plaintiff to first post security in an appropriate amount to be determined by the magistrate. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc) .Modified on 6/6/2017. (lc).
JS-6
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
RODNEY HERACHIO DIXON,
Case № 5:17-cv-00363-ODW (DTB)
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
JUDGMENT
14
NPG MUSIC PUBLISHING, LLC; NPG
15
RECORDS, INC.; COMERICA BANK
16
AND TRUST N.A.; and DOES 1–10,
Defendants.
17
18
19
On February 24, 2017, Plaintiff Rodney Herachio Dixon filed a complaint in
20
this Court. (ECF No. 1.) On April 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint
21
alleging: (1) copyright infringement; (2) breach of contract; and (3) intentional
22
interference with contractual relations. (First Am. Compl. ¶¶ 64–87, ECF No. 26.)
23
On June 6, 2017, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss without leave to
24
amend and Defendants’ motion to deem Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. (ECF Nos. 30,
25
39.)
26
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
27
1.
28
Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendants, and his claims against
Defendants are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice;
2.
Defendants shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill of
3
3.
Plaintiff is a vexatious litigant.
4
4.
Plaintiff, or any person acting on his behalf, must first obtain written
1
2
costs.
5
authorization from a magistrate judge before initiating a new action against Comerica
6
Bank and Trust, N.A. as Personal Representative for the Estate of Prince Rogers
7
Nelson; NPG Music Publishing, LLC; NPG Records, Inc.; or any other entity
8
controlled by the Personal Representative that is related to (1) a contract, of any type,
9
to which Prince was a party, or (2) any of the 965 songs included in the April 4, 2014
10
transfer of rights (the “Exclusive Songwriter Agreement”). Plaintiff will be allowed
11
to file a complaint if a magistrate judge finds that the proposed complaint is not
12
frivolous and not duplicative of any claim Plaintiff has already filed in state or federal
13
court. If the magistrate judge allows the filing but determines, based on the pleadings
14
and any evidence provided by the parties, that there is no reasonable probability
15
Plaintiff will prevail in the litigation, the magistrate may order Plaintiff to first post
16
security in an appropriate amount to be determined by the magistrate.
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
June 6, 2017
20
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
cc: Civil Intake
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?