John Meggs v. 4R Enterprises, Inc.
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge S. James Otero. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than April 24, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Orderto Show Cause, on or before the above date: Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default. (smo)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
CASE NO.: ED CV 17-00404 SJO (DTBx)
TITLE:
DATE: April 19, 2017
John Meggs v. 4R Enterprises, Inc
========================================================================
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Victor Paul Cruz
Courtroom Clerk
Not Present
Court Reporter
COUNSEL PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S):
COUNSEL PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT(S):
Not Present
Not Present
========================================================================
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than April 24, 2017 why this
action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order
to Show Cause, on or before the above date:
Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default;
In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15,
no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand
submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the
court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL GEN
:
Page 1 of
1
Initials of Preparer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?