David Reschke v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Filing 17

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym GRANTING PARTIES STIPULATION GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION [NOTE CHANGE MADE BY THECOURT TO STIPULATION § VI.C] (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Peggy A. Farrell, SBN 210853 Rene Potter, SBN 301971 POTTER HANDY, LLP Mail: PO Box 261843 San Diego, CA 92196-1843 Delivery: 9845 Erma Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92131 Phone: (858) 375-7385 Fax: (888) 422-5191 Email: PeggyF@PotterHandy.com; ReneP@PotterHandy.com 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID RESCHKE, an individual UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 DAVID RESCHKE, an individual, CASE NO.5:17-cv-414 DSF (SPx) 14 15 16 Plaintiff, vs. 17 18 19 20 21 22 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and, DOES 1-100, inclusive, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES STIPULATION GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION [NOTE CHANGE MADE BY THE COURT TO STIPULATION § VI.C] Complaint Filed: December 20, 2016 Defendant(s). Removed to District Court January 26,2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING PARTIES STIPULATION GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION 1 ORDER 2 3 GOOD CAUSE having been hereby shown, the Court hereby approves this 4 Stipulation Governing the Disclosure of Privileged Information and Protective 5 Order, with one change to § VI.C. Namely, any motion to retain confidentiality 6 shall be filed in compliance with Civil Local Rule 37, including the joint 7 stipulation requirement. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 Dated: July 17, 2017 Signed: _________________________ Hon. Sheri Pym Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING PARTIES STIPULATION GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?