William J. Richards v. County of San Bernardino et al

Filing 142

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: The Court enters the following order on Defendants motion for Summary Judgment as follows: AS TO DEFENDANTS GREGONIS, SPERBER, NOURSE, PARENT, BRADFORD AND NAVARRO: 1) Defendants did not violate Plaintiffs rights. 2) This Court did not reach the issue of qualified immunity, as it found no violation of rights. AS TO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO:(1) Plaintiffs claim for municipal liability under Monell v. Dept. of SocialServices, 436 U.S. 658, 56 L. Ed. 2d 6 11, 98 S. Ct. 2018 (1978) fails because hesuffered no constitutional violation and there is no evidence of an unconstitutional policy, practice, custom, lack of training, or ratification.Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, Defendants Daniel G regonis, Norman Sperber, Tom Bradford, John Navarro, Mark Nourse, Norman Parent, and County of San Bernardino are granted summary judgment in this case and the entire matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, reasonable costs to be awarded to Defendants in an amount according to proof. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 September 17, 2019 3 VC P 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM J. RICHARDS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Case No. 5:17-cv-00497-SJO-SP [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, MARK NOURSE, NORMAN PARENT, TOM BRADFORD, JOHN NAVARRO, DANIEL GREGONIS, NORMAN SPERBER, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, 15 16 17 District Judge: Hon. S. James Otero Defendants. 18 19 20 Defendants Daniel Gregonis, Norman Sperber, Tom Bradford, John Navarro, 21 Mark Nourse, Norman Parent, and County of San Bernardino’s motions for 22 summary judgment, or in the alternative partial summary judgment brought under 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, on the Complaint of Plaintiff William J. 24 Richards (“Plaintiff”), came on regularly before the Honorable S. James Otero for 25 hearing on August 26, 2019. Susan Coleman appeared for Defendants, and 26 attorneys Caitlin Weisberg and Marilyn Bednarski appeared for Plaintiff. 27 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES The Court having read and duly considered the moving, opposing, and reply documents, and having duly considered all evidence and argument presented in LA #4810-3654-4420 v1 -1- 5:17-CV-00497-SJO-SP [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 connection therewith, enters the following order on Defendants’ motion for 2 Summary Judgment as follows: 3 AS TO DEFENDANTS GREGONIS, SPERBER, NOURSE, PARENT, 4 BRADFORD AND NAVARRO: 5 1) Defendants did not violate Plaintiff’s rights. 6 2) This Court did not reach the issue of qualified immunity, as it found no 7 violation of rights. 8 AS TO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO: 9 (1) Plaintiff’s claim for municipal liability under Monell v. Dept. of Social 10 Services, 436 U.S. 658, 56 L. Ed. 2d 611, 98 S. Ct. 2018 (1978) fails because he 11 suffered no constitutional violation and there is no evidence of an unconstitutional 12 policy, practice, custom, lack of training, or ratification. 13 Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, 14 Defendants Daniel Gregonis, Norman Sperber, Tom Bradford, John Navarro, 15 Mark Nourse, Norman Parent, and County of San Bernardino are granted summary 16 judgment in this case and the entire matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, 17 reasonable costs to be awarded to Defendants in an amount according to proof. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED: 19 20 Dated: September 17, 2019 21 ________________________________ Honorable S. James Otero United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES LA #4810-3654-4420 v1 -2- 5:17-CV-00497-SJO-SP [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 Susan E. Coleman (SBN 171832) E-mail: scoleman@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, MARK NOURSE, NORMAN PARENT, TOM BRADFORD, JOHN NAVARRO, DANIEL GREGONIS, NORMAN SPERBER 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES LA #4810-3654-4420 v1 -3- 5:17-CV-00497-SJO-SP [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?