William J. Richards v. County of San Bernardino et al
Filing
142
JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: The Court enters the following order on Defendants motion for Summary Judgment as follows: AS TO DEFENDANTS GREGONIS, SPERBER, NOURSE, PARENT, BRADFORD AND NAVARRO: 1) Defendants did not violate Plaintiffs rights. 2) This Court did not reach the issue of qualified immunity, as it found no violation of rights. AS TO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO:(1) Plaintiffs claim for municipal liability under Monell v. Dept. of SocialServices, 436 U.S. 658, 56 L. Ed. 2d 6 11, 98 S. Ct. 2018 (1978) fails because hesuffered no constitutional violation and there is no evidence of an unconstitutional policy, practice, custom, lack of training, or ratification.Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, Defendants Daniel G regonis, Norman Sperber, Tom Bradford, John Navarro, Mark Nourse, Norman Parent, and County of San Bernardino are granted summary judgment in this case and the entire matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, reasonable costs to be awarded to Defendants in an amount according to proof. (lc)
1
2
September 17, 2019
3
VC
P
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM J. RICHARDS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
Case No. 5:17-cv-00497-SJO-SP
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
MARK NOURSE, NORMAN
PARENT, TOM BRADFORD, JOHN
NAVARRO, DANIEL GREGONIS,
NORMAN SPERBER, and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,,
15
16
17
District Judge: Hon. S. James Otero
Defendants.
18
19
20
Defendants Daniel Gregonis, Norman Sperber, Tom Bradford, John Navarro,
21
Mark Nourse, Norman Parent, and County of San Bernardino’s motions for
22
summary judgment, or in the alternative partial summary judgment brought under
23
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, on the Complaint of Plaintiff William J.
24
Richards (“Plaintiff”), came on regularly before the Honorable S. James Otero for
25
hearing on August 26, 2019. Susan Coleman appeared for Defendants, and
26
attorneys Caitlin Weisberg and Marilyn Bednarski appeared for Plaintiff.
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENSEN , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
The Court having read and duly considered the moving, opposing, and reply
documents, and having duly considered all evidence and argument presented in
LA #4810-3654-4420 v1
-1-
5:17-CV-00497-SJO-SP
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
1
connection therewith, enters the following order on Defendants’ motion for
2
Summary Judgment as follows:
3
AS TO DEFENDANTS GREGONIS, SPERBER, NOURSE, PARENT,
4
BRADFORD AND NAVARRO:
5
1)
Defendants did not violate Plaintiff’s rights.
6
2)
This Court did not reach the issue of qualified immunity, as it found no
7
violation of rights.
8
AS TO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO:
9
(1)
Plaintiff’s claim for municipal liability under Monell v. Dept. of Social
10
Services, 436 U.S. 658, 56 L. Ed. 2d 611, 98 S. Ct. 2018 (1978) fails because he
11
suffered no constitutional violation and there is no evidence of an unconstitutional
12
policy, practice, custom, lack of training, or ratification.
13
Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN,
14
Defendants Daniel Gregonis, Norman Sperber, Tom Bradford, John Navarro,
15
Mark Nourse, Norman Parent, and County of San Bernardino are granted summary
16
judgment in this case and the entire matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice,
17
reasonable costs to be awarded to Defendants in an amount according to proof.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED:
19
20
Dated: September 17, 2019
21
________________________________
Honorable S. James Otero
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENSEN , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
LA #4810-3654-4420 v1
-2-
5:17-CV-00497-SJO-SP
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
Susan E. Coleman (SBN 171832)
E-mail: scoleman@bwslaw.com
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953
Tel: 213.236.0600
Fax: 213.236.2700
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
MARK NOURSE, NORMAN
PARENT, TOM BRADFORD, JOHN
NAVARRO, DANIEL GREGONIS,
NORMAN SPERBER
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENSEN , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
LA #4810-3654-4420 v1
-3-
5:17-CV-00497-SJO-SP
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?