Guadalupe Guevara v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Filing
24
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation) 22 lodged concurre nt with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 23 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ch)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
SANDRA R. BROWN
Acting United States Attorney
DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, General Civil Section
STACY WIESBROCK, CSBN 257920
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5612
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: stacy.wiesbrock@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EASTERN DIVISION
GUADALUPE GUEVARA,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
22
) No. 5:17-CV-00541-PLA
)
)
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
(“Stipulation ”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of
Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for
further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
DATED: November 8, 2017
HON. PAUL L. ABRAMS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?