Frank Rust v. Chino Prison Healthcare Providers et al
Filing
22
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Dkt. 8), the other records on file herein, and the Report a nd Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 20). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made (Dkt. 21). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Dkt. 8) is DENIED. (lwag)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
Case No. ED CV-17-00556-JAK (KES)
FRANK A. RUST
Plaintiff,
v.
CHINO PRISON HEALTHCARE
PROVIDERS,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Respondent.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion to
Remand (Dkt. 8), the other records on file herein, and the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 20). Further, the
Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and
Recommendation to which objections have been made (Dkt. 21).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court accepts the findings and
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand
(Dkt. 8) is DENIED.
DATED: July 7, 2017
26
27
28
____________________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?