Natia Sampson v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 49

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Percy Anderson, in favor of County of Los Angeles against Natia Sampson Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, 48 . 1. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Third Amended Complaint is dismisse d without leave to amend; 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant shall have judgment in its favor; and 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff Natia Sampson shall take nothing and Defendant shall have its costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. NATIA SAMPSON, ED CV 17-599 PA (PJWx) JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, by and through THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES; DOES 1–10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 In accordance with the Court’s March 5, 2018, Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant County of Los Angeles (“Defendant”), 1. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Third Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant shall have judgment in its favor; and 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff Natia Sampson shall take nothing and Defendant shall have its costs of suit. 26 27 28 DATED: March 5, 2018 ___________________________________ Percy Anderson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?