Fidelina Rangel v. Forest River, Inc., et al

Filing 27

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter. The Court, having considered the Stipulation by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 26 , hereby orders that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Paul K. Haines (State Bar No. 248226) phaines@haineslawgroup.com Fletcher W. Schmidt (State Bar No. 286462) fschmidt@haineslawgroup.com Andrew J. Rowbotham (State Bar No. 301367) arowbotham@haineslawgroup.com HAINES LAW GROUP, APC 2274 East Maple Ave. El Segundo, California 90245 Tel: (424) 292-2350 Fax: (424) 292-2355 JS-6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 FIDELINA RANGEL 9 10 11 12 13 Maureen K. Bogue (State Bar No. 194755) maureen@pacificemploymentlaw.com Noah Levin (State Bar No. 263069) noah@pacificemploymentlaw.com PACIFIC EMPLOYMENT LAW LLP 101 California Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 985-7300 Fax: (415) 985-7301 14 Attorneys for Defendant 15 FOREST RIVER, INC. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 FIDELINA RANGEL as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 20 situated, Plaintiff, 21 19 22 23 24 vs. FOREST RIVER, INC., an Indiana Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. Case No. 5:17-cv-0613 JFW (SSx) CLASS ACTION ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Complaint Filed: February 2, 2017 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No. 5:17-cv-0613 JFW (SSx) 1 2 3 The Court, having considered the Stipulation by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby orders that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: September 13, 2017 8 Honorable John F. Walker United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No. 5:17-cv-0613 JFW (SSx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?