Fidelina Rangel v. Forest River, Inc., et al
Filing
27
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter. The Court, having considered the Stipulation by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 26 , hereby orders that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Paul K. Haines (State Bar No. 248226)
phaines@haineslawgroup.com
Fletcher W. Schmidt (State Bar No. 286462)
fschmidt@haineslawgroup.com
Andrew J. Rowbotham (State Bar No. 301367)
arowbotham@haineslawgroup.com
HAINES LAW GROUP, APC
2274 East Maple Ave.
El Segundo, California 90245
Tel: (424) 292-2350
Fax: (424) 292-2355
JS-6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8 FIDELINA RANGEL
9
10
11
12
13
Maureen K. Bogue (State Bar No. 194755)
maureen@pacificemploymentlaw.com
Noah Levin (State Bar No. 263069)
noah@pacificemploymentlaw.com
PACIFIC EMPLOYMENT LAW LLP
101 California Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel.: (415) 985-7300
Fax: (415) 985-7301
14
Attorneys for Defendant
15 FOREST RIVER, INC.
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
FIDELINA RANGEL as an individual
and on behalf of all others similarly
20 situated,
Plaintiff,
21
19
22
23
24
vs.
FOREST RIVER, INC., an Indiana
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100,
Defendants.
Case No. 5:17-cv-0613 JFW (SSx)
CLASS ACTION
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
Complaint Filed: February 2, 2017
25
26
27
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No. 5:17-cv-0613 JFW (SSx)
1
2
3
The Court, having considered the Stipulation by the parties pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby orders that this action be dismissed
without prejudice.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7 Dated: September 13, 2017
8
Honorable John F. Walker
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No. 5:17-cv-0613 JFW (SSx)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?