Tonya Washington v. Internal Revenue Service et al

Filing 33

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 30 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 TONYA WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. EDCV 17-617-DSF (AGR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on 18 file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 19 Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to 20 which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of 21 the Magistrate Judge. 22 IT IS ORDERED that (1) the City’s motion to dismiss the First Amended 23 Complaint is granted and all claims against the City are dismissed without leave to 24 amend; (2) the IRS Defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint is 25 granted; (4) Plaintiff’s Bivens claims against the IRS Defendants are dismissed with 26 prejudice; (5) the FOIA claims, Privacy Act claims, Administrative Procedure Act 27 28 1 claim, and state law claims against the IRS Defendants are dismissed for lack of 2 jurisdiction; and (6) Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is denied. 3 4 8/1/17 DATED: DALE S. FISCHER United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?