Tonya Washington v. Internal Revenue Service et al
Filing
33
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 30 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (See Order for details.) (mp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
TONYA WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
v.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. EDCV 17-617-DSF (AGR)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on
18
file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
19
Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to
20
which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of
21
the Magistrate Judge.
22
IT IS ORDERED that (1) the City’s motion to dismiss the First Amended
23
Complaint is granted and all claims against the City are dismissed without leave to
24
amend; (2) the IRS Defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint is
25
granted; (4) Plaintiff’s Bivens claims against the IRS Defendants are dismissed with
26
prejudice; (5) the FOIA claims, Privacy Act claims, Administrative Procedure Act
27
28
1
claim, and state law claims against the IRS Defendants are dismissed for lack of
2
jurisdiction; and (6) Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is denied.
3
4
8/1/17
DATED:
DALE S. FISCHER
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?