Duane James Bowen et al v. The People State of California et al

Filing 10

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Dale S. Fischer for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 6 . The Court accepts the M agistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. (dml)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUANE JAMES BOWEN, 11 12 13 ) Petitioner, v. CASE NO. ED CV 17-691-DSF (DTB) ) ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ) ) 14 Respondents. ) 15 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, 18 the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United 19 States Magistrate Judge. 20 Recommendation have been filed. 21 Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. 22 No objections to the Report and The Court accepts the Magistrate Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, 23 the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of 24 the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of 25 26 27 28 1 appealability is denied. 2 22(b); Miller-E1 v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 3 4 ~ DATED: ~~~-``~~I 17 5 6 7 DALE S- FISCHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S:\PJW\Cases-State Habeas\BOWEN, D 691\Order accep r&r.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?