Arthur Nicholas Gilreath v. Corten Bach et al

Filing 43

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AGAINST DEFENDANT CORTEN BACH FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/3/2017. [See Order for details.] (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service Form, # 2 Notice of Dismissal Form) (san)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

EDCV 17-0694-DOC (JEM)

Date

Title

Oct. 13, 2017

Arthur Nicholas Gilreath v. Corten Bach, et al.

Present: The
Honorable
S. Anthony
Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Proceedings:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED AGAINST DEFENDANT CORTEN BACH FOR LACK OF
PROSECUTION

Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing no later than November 3, 2017, why this action
should not be dismissed against Defendant Corten Bach for lack of prosecution.
The Court will consider the filing of one of the following to be an appropriate response to this
Order, on or before the above date:
3

Proof of service of the summons and complaint on Corten Bach establishing proper
service, as explained in the Court’s June 14, 2017 order.1 (Form POS-010.) OR

3

Notice of voluntary dismissal of Corten Bach. (Form CV-09.)

In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral
argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. This Order will stand submitted upon
the filing of a response by Plaintiff. Failure to respond may result in the dismissal of the action.
The Clerk is directed to provide Plaintiff with a copy of Form POS-010 and Form CV-09.
cc: Parties
:
Initials of Preparer

sa

1

In the June 14, 2017 minute order, the Court mistakenly referenced the California Highway
Patrol (“CHP”) as a defendant. However, the CHP is not a named defendant in this action.
CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1