United States of America v. Real Property Located in Riverside, California
Filing
12
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that The United States of America shall have judgment as to the defendant property, and, other than those interests recognized herein, no other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. The legal description of the defendant property, which property has Assessor Parcel Number 253-221-008, is more fully (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). Related to: Stipulation for Order 11 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (jp)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
15
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
EASTERN DIVISION
17
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
18
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
21
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
FANG ZENG,
Titleholder.
)
) NO. EDCV 17-1034-MWF (RAOx)
)
)
) CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
28
1
1
Plaintiff and potential claimants Fang Zeng and Sal S.
2
Ruiz, Trustee of the Sarsons, Inc. profit sharing plan
3
(“potential claimants”) have made a stipulated request for the
4
entry of this Consent Judgment, resolving this action in its
5
entirety.
6
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the
7
parties, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY ORDERS
8
ADJUDGES AND DECREES:
9
1.
The government has given and published notice of this
10
action as required by law, including Rule G of the Supplemental
11
Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture
12
Actions, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules
13
of this Court.
14
this case or answered the complaint.
15
claimants would have filed claims and answers in this case
16
absent this agreement.
17
answers have been filed, and the time for filing such statements
18
of interest and answers has expired.
19
jurisdiction over the parties to this judgment and the defendant
20
property.
21
other than Fang Zeng and Sal S. Ruiz, Trustee of the Sarsons,
22
Inc. profit sharing plan are deemed to have admitted the
23
allegations of the complaint with respect to the defendant
24
property.
25
2.
Potential claimants have not filed claims in
However, potential
No other statements of interest or
This Court has
Any potential claimants to the defendant property
The United States of America shall have judgment as to
26
the defendant property, and, other than those interests
27
recognized herein, no other person or entity shall have any
28
2
1
right, title or interest therein. The legal description of the
2
defendant property, which property has Assessor Parcel Number
3
253-221-008, is more fully described as follows:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Parcel 1: A condominium comprised of the following:
(a) A separate interest in Condominium Unit #8 as
shown on Condominium Plat (“Plan”) recorded on July
23, 2014, as instrument No. 2014-0273191, of the
Riverside County Official Records, and as further
described in the Master Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions for the Rocky Point
Terrace recorded on July 23, 2014, as instrument No.
2014-0273192 of the Riverside County Official Records
(“Declaration”), and (b) An undivided one-seventh
(1/7th) tenancy-in-common interest in the Phase 2
Common Area as described in the Plan and Declaration.
Parcel 2: The exclusive right to use the appurtenant
Exclusive Use Areas set aside and allocated for the
exclusive use of the Owner of the Condominium
described as Parcel 1, above, as described in the
Declaration and as shown on the Plan.
15
16
Parcel 3: Non-exclusive rights and easements in the
Association Property as described in the Declaration.
17
3.
The United States is hereby authorized to remove any
18
occupants and/or personal property remaining on the defendant
19
property thirty days after the giving of written notice to any
20
occupants of the defendant property without further order of
21
this Court.
22
property.
23
24
The United States shall thereafter sell the
The proceeds of the sale shall be distributed in the
following priority, to the extent proceeds are available:
a.
To the United States for its costs and expenses
25
of the sale;
26
b.
To the Riverside County Assessor and Tax
27
Collector of all unpaid real property taxes
28
3
1
assessed against the defendant property to the
2
date of entry of the Judgment of Forfeiture;
3
c.
To Sal R. Ruiz, Trustee of the Sarsons, Inc.
4
profit sharing plan as follows:
5
i.
6
All unpaid principal and interest due under
the Note which is secured by the Deed of
7
Trust recorded as Instrument No. 2017-
8
0017823 against the defendant property
9
identifying Sal Ruiz, Trustee of the
10
Sarsons, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan as
11
beneficiary, as of the date of the
12
closing with respect to Plaintiff’s sale of
13
the defendant property; and
14
ii.
15
All other fees, costs and advances as
16
provided under the terms of the Note and
17
Deed of Trust, as of the date of the closing
18
with respect to Plaintiff’s sale of the
19
defendant property.
20
advances include, but are not limited to,
21
fees, advances or costs for property taxes,
22
insurance (including for hazard insurance),
23
reasonable attorney fees and costs and fees
24
and costs incurred in protecting
25
26
These fees, costs and
Sal S. Ruiz’s security interest; and
d.
The balance shall be paid and forfeited to the
27
United States of America, and such funds shall be
28
4
disposed of according to law.
1
2
4.
Potential claimants have agreed to release the United
3
States of America, its agencies, agents, and officers, including
4
employees and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
5
from any and all claims, actions or liabilities arising out of
6
7
or related to this action, including, without limitation, any
claim for attorneys’ fees, costs or interest which may be
8
asserted on behalf of potential claimants against the United
9
States, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or otherwise.
10
Potential claimants have also waived any rights they may have to
11
seek remission or mitigation of the forfeiture.
Nothing in this
12
Consent Judgment is intended as, nor should anything in this
13
14
15
16
Consent Judgment be interpreted as an admission by potential
claimants of any liability or wrongdoing.
//
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
1
5.
The court finds that there was reasonable cause for the
2
institution of these proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
3
§ 2465.
4
cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465.
This judgment constitutes a certificate of reasonable
5
6
DATED: August 31, 2017
7
____________________________________
THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Prepared by:
SANDRA R. BROWN
Acting United States Attorney
LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
STEVEN R. WELK
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section
15
16
17
/s/ Jonathan Galatzan
JONATHAN GALATZAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Asset Forfeiture Section
18
19
Attorney for Plaintiff
United States of America
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?