United States of America v. Real Property Located in Riverside, California

Filing 12

CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that The United States of America shall have judgment as to the defendant property, and, other than those interests recognized herein, no other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. The legal description of the defendant property, which property has Assessor Parcel Number 253-221-008, is more fully (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). Related to: Stipulation for Order 11 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 EASTERN DIVISION 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 18 Plaintiff, 19 vs. 20 21 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 FANG ZENG, Titleholder. ) ) NO. EDCV 17-1034-MWF (RAOx) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 28 1 1 Plaintiff and potential claimants Fang Zeng and Sal S. 2 Ruiz, Trustee of the Sarsons, Inc. profit sharing plan 3 (“potential claimants”) have made a stipulated request for the 4 entry of this Consent Judgment, resolving this action in its 5 entirety. 6 The Court, having considered the stipulation of the 7 parties, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY ORDERS 8 ADJUDGES AND DECREES: 9 1. The government has given and published notice of this 10 action as required by law, including Rule G of the Supplemental 11 Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture 12 Actions, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules 13 of this Court. 14 this case or answered the complaint. 15 claimants would have filed claims and answers in this case 16 absent this agreement. 17 answers have been filed, and the time for filing such statements 18 of interest and answers has expired. 19 jurisdiction over the parties to this judgment and the defendant 20 property. 21 other than Fang Zeng and Sal S. Ruiz, Trustee of the Sarsons, 22 Inc. profit sharing plan are deemed to have admitted the 23 allegations of the complaint with respect to the defendant 24 property. 25 2. Potential claimants have not filed claims in However, potential No other statements of interest or This Court has Any potential claimants to the defendant property The United States of America shall have judgment as to 26 the defendant property, and, other than those interests 27 recognized herein, no other person or entity shall have any 28 2 1 right, title or interest therein. The legal description of the 2 defendant property, which property has Assessor Parcel Number 3 253-221-008, is more fully described as follows: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Parcel 1: A condominium comprised of the following: (a) A separate interest in Condominium Unit #8 as shown on Condominium Plat (“Plan”) recorded on July 23, 2014, as instrument No. 2014-0273191, of the Riverside County Official Records, and as further described in the Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for the Rocky Point Terrace recorded on July 23, 2014, as instrument No. 2014-0273192 of the Riverside County Official Records (“Declaration”), and (b) An undivided one-seventh (1/7th) tenancy-in-common interest in the Phase 2 Common Area as described in the Plan and Declaration. Parcel 2: The exclusive right to use the appurtenant Exclusive Use Areas set aside and allocated for the exclusive use of the Owner of the Condominium described as Parcel 1, above, as described in the Declaration and as shown on the Plan. 15 16 Parcel 3: Non-exclusive rights and easements in the Association Property as described in the Declaration. 17 3. The United States is hereby authorized to remove any 18 occupants and/or personal property remaining on the defendant 19 property thirty days after the giving of written notice to any 20 occupants of the defendant property without further order of 21 this Court. 22 property. 23 24 The United States shall thereafter sell the The proceeds of the sale shall be distributed in the following priority, to the extent proceeds are available: a. To the United States for its costs and expenses 25 of the sale; 26 b. To the Riverside County Assessor and Tax 27 Collector of all unpaid real property taxes 28 3 1 assessed against the defendant property to the 2 date of entry of the Judgment of Forfeiture; 3 c. To Sal R. Ruiz, Trustee of the Sarsons, Inc. 4 profit sharing plan as follows: 5 i. 6 All unpaid principal and interest due under the Note which is secured by the Deed of 7 Trust recorded as Instrument No. 2017- 8 0017823 against the defendant property 9 identifying Sal Ruiz, Trustee of the 10 Sarsons, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan as 11 beneficiary, as of the date of the 12 closing with respect to Plaintiff’s sale of 13 the defendant property; and 14 ii. 15 All other fees, costs and advances as 16 provided under the terms of the Note and 17 Deed of Trust, as of the date of the closing 18 with respect to Plaintiff’s sale of the 19 defendant property. 20 advances include, but are not limited to, 21 fees, advances or costs for property taxes, 22 insurance (including for hazard insurance), 23 reasonable attorney fees and costs and fees 24 and costs incurred in protecting 25 26 These fees, costs and Sal S. Ruiz’s security interest; and d. The balance shall be paid and forfeited to the 27 United States of America, and such funds shall be 28 4 disposed of according to law. 1 2 4. Potential claimants have agreed to release the United 3 States of America, its agencies, agents, and officers, including 4 employees and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 5 from any and all claims, actions or liabilities arising out of 6 7 or related to this action, including, without limitation, any claim for attorneys’ fees, costs or interest which may be 8 asserted on behalf of potential claimants against the United 9 States, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or otherwise. 10 Potential claimants have also waived any rights they may have to 11 seek remission or mitigation of the forfeiture. Nothing in this 12 Consent Judgment is intended as, nor should anything in this 13 14 15 16 Consent Judgment be interpreted as an admission by potential claimants of any liability or wrongdoing. // 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 1 5. The court finds that there was reasonable cause for the 2 institution of these proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 § 2465. 4 cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. This judgment constitutes a certificate of reasonable 5 6 DATED: August 31, 2017 7 ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Prepared by: SANDRA R. BROWN Acting United States Attorney LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section 15 16 17 /s/ Jonathan Galatzan JONATHAN GALATZAN Assistant United States Attorney Asset Forfeiture Section 18 19 Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?