Chaka Gilbert v. Audrey King

Filing 4

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/14/2017. [See Order for details.] (san)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. EDCV 17-1105-DSF (JEM) Title CHAKA GILBERT v. AUDREY KING Present: The Honorable Date July 31, 2017 John E. McDermott, United States Magistrate Judge S. Anthony Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE June 20, 2017, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order Dismissing Petition With Leave to Amend, which directed Plaintiff to file a First Amended Petition (“FAP”) no later than July 20, 2017. (Docket No. 3). To date, Plaintiff has not file a FAP. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause no later than August 14, 2017.1 Plaintiff’s failure to respond in writing to the Order to Show Cause by the deadline will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. Filing of a FAP consistent with the requirements of the June 20, 2017 Order shall be a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. No extensions of this deadline will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. cc: Parties : Initials of Preparer sa 1 Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will not be heard unless ordered by the Court. Upon the filing of a Response, the Order to Show Cause will stand submitted. CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?