Chaka Gilbert v. Audrey King
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/14/2017. [See Order for details.] (san)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
EDCV 17-1105-DSF (JEM)
Title
CHAKA GILBERT v. AUDREY KING
Present: The Honorable
Date
July 31, 2017
John E. McDermott, United States Magistrate Judge
S. Anthony
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
None
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
June 20, 2017, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order Dismissing Petition With
Leave to Amend, which directed Plaintiff to file a First Amended Petition (“FAP”) no later than
July 20, 2017. (Docket No. 3). To date, Plaintiff has not file a FAP.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be
dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.
Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause no later than August
14, 2017.1 Plaintiff’s failure to respond in writing to the Order to Show Cause by the deadline
will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure
to comply with a court order.
Filing of a FAP consistent with the requirements of the June 20, 2017 Order shall be a
satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. No extensions of this deadline will be
granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
cc: Parties
:
Initials of Preparer
sa
1
Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, oral argument on this
Order to Show Cause will not be heard unless ordered by the Court. Upon the filing of a Response, the Order to
Show Cause will stand submitted.
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?