Richard Marcus Anderson v. W.L. Montgomery

Filing 12

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 by Judge David O. Carter. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (See Order for complete details) (afe)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION 9 10 RICHARD MARCUS ANDERSON, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. EDCV 17-1156-DOC(AS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 17 18 Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and 19 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections 20 were filed. 21 conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings and 22 IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the 23 24 Petition with prejudice. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, 2 the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein 3 on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent. 4 5 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 6 7 DATED: November 30, 2017 _____________________________. 8 9 10 11 ___________________________________ DAVID O. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?