Richard Marcus Anderson v. W.L. Montgomery
Filing
12
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 by Judge David O. Carter. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION
9
10
RICHARD MARCUS ANDERSON,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
v.
W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden,
14
Respondent.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. EDCV 17-1156-DOC(AS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the
17
18
Petition,
all
of
the
records
herein
and
the
attached
Report
and
19
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections
20
were filed.
21
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
The Court concurs with and accepts the findings and
22
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the
23
24
Petition with prejudice.
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order,
2
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein
3
on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.
4
5
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
6
7
DATED:
November 30, 2017
_____________________________.
8
9
10
11
___________________________________
DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?