Keith Desmond Taylor v. Ron Davis

Filing 5

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: This action is transferred to the Eastern Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The Clerk of the Court shall transfer the case forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/2/17. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2017) [Transferred from California Northern on 8/3/2017.]

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

KEITH DESMOND TAYLOR,
Petitioner,

8

RON DAVIS, Warden,
Respondent.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

ORDER OF TRANSFER

v.

9
10

Case No. 17-cv-04220-DMR (PR)

Petitioner, a condemned prisoner incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison, has filed this

13

pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the validity

14

of his conviction obtained in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. Dkt. 1. Petitioner has

15

also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 2.

16
17
18

On July 25, 2017, the Clerk of the Court informed Petitioner that this action has been
assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge.1 Dkt. 4.
A petition for a writ of habeas corpus made by a person in custody under the judgment and

19

sentence of a state court of a State which contains two or more federal judicial districts may be

20

filed in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

21

The district court where the petition is filed, however, may transfer the petition to the other district

22

in the furtherance of justice. See id. Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear

23

petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of conviction. See Dannenberg v.

24

Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal.

25
1

26
27
28

Petitioner had initially filed along with his petition a form entitled, “Consent or
Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.” Dkt. 3. However, he did not fill it out with a check
mark indicating whether he consented to or declined magistrate judge jurisdiction. See id.
Therefore, as mentioned above, the Clerk sent Petitioner a notice that his case had been assigned
to a magistrate judge. Dkt. 4. To date, Petitioner has not yet returned the form indicating whether
he consents to or declines magistrate judge jurisdiction in this action.

1

1968). If the petition is directed to the manner in which a sentence is being executed, e.g., if it

2

involves parole or time credits claims, the district of confinement is the preferable forum. See

3

Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989).

4

Here, Petitioner challenges a conviction and sentence incurred in the San Bernardino

5

County Superior Court, which is within the venue of the Eastern Division of the Central District of

6

California. Therefore, the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of the Central

7

District of California has jurisdiction over this matter.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and in the interest of justice,

9

this action is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern Division of the United States District Court for the

10

Central District of California.2 Therefore, the Clerk of the Court shall transfer the case forthwith.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

All remaining pending motions are TERMINATED on this court’s docket as no longer pending in

12

this district. Dkt. 2.

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 2, 2017

15
16
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2

28

Venue transfer is a non-dispositive matter and, thus, it falls within the scope of the
jurisdiction of the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).
2

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

KEITH DESMOND TAYLOR,

Case No. 4:17-cv-04220-DMR

Plaintiff,
5
v.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

6
7

RON DAVIS,
Defendant.

8
9
10

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

That on August 2, 2017, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

16
17
18
19

Keith Desmond Taylor ID: H46885
San Quentin State Prison
San Quentin, CA 94974
Dated: August 2, 2017

20
21
22

Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court

23
24
25
26

By:________________________
Ivy Lerma Garcia, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable DONNA M. RYU

27
28
3