Michelle Watkins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
Filing
19
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real: THE COURT having been advised by the counsel for the parties that the action has been settled 18 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the ri ght, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to reopen the action if the settlement is not consummated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dates set in this action are hereby vacated. The Court reserves its jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the settlement. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
1
ENTER JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHELLE WATKINS, an
individual,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., a
Delaware corporation, WAL-MART
ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and DOES 1-25,
inclusive,
Defendant,
____________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.
EDCV-17-1597-R
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
18
19
THE COURT having been advised by the counsel for the parties that the above-
20 entitled action has been settled;
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs
22 and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to reopen the
23 action if the settlement is not consummated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dates set
24 in this action are hereby vacated. The Court reserves its jurisdiction for the purpose of
25 enforcing the settlement.
26
27 Dated February 20, 2018
28
MANUEL L. REAL
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?