Sam Piro et al v. County of San Bernardino et al

Filing 49

JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court, upon consideration of all moving papers and exhibits and the opposition papers and exhibits, and after considering all arguments of counsel, this co urt finds that all claims arising out of plaintiff's Complaint fail and are summarily adjudicated in favor of defendants. THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DEPUTY ANTO NIO ACOSTA; and DEPUTY NICHOLAS CRAIG, and against Plaintiffs SAM PIRO and SHANNON PIRO as to all causes of action in the Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint; and that Defendants COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DEPUTY ANTONIO ACOSTA; and DEPUTY NICHOLAS CRAIG, be awarded their statutory costs as allowable by law, and may file a motion for an award of reasonable attorney's fees, if appropriate. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

1
2

3
4
5
6
7
8

g
10

Risa S. Christensen, Esq., CA Bar No. 227799
Dennis E. Wagner, Esq., CA Bar No. 99190
WAGNER & PELAYES, LLP
1325 Spruce Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92507
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

JS-6

Attorneys for Defendants,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DEPUTY ANTONIO ACOSTA;
and DEPUTY NICHOLAS CRAIG

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24

25
26

SAM PIRO and SHANNON PIRO,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO;
DEPUTY ACOSTA; DEPUTY CRAIG;
CITY OF VICTORVILLE; CODE
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
REYNOLDS; and DOES 1-20,
Inclusive,
Defendants.

CASE NO.: 5:17-cv-1607 PSG (SPx)

JUDGMENT RE:
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
{Filed concurrently w/ Motion for
Summary Judgnyent,· Separate
Statement; Declarations ofAntonio
Acosta, Nicholas Craig, 1<.yan
Brosowske, Kevin Fries,Robert Trostle,
Dani-Paul Pineda, and Risa
Christensen,· Notice of Lodging,· and
(Proposed) OrderJ

DATE: January 7, 2019
TIME:
1:30 p.m.
CRTRM: 6A
Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez

27

28
[JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS SAM PIRO AND SHANNON PIRO:

2

The Court, upon consideration of all moving papers and exhibits and the

3

opposition papers and exhibits, and after considering all arguments of counsel,

4

this court finds that all claims arising out of plaintiff's Complaint fail and are

5
6

summarily adjudicated in favor of defendants.
THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered in

7

favor of Defendants, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DEPUTY ANTONIO

8

ACOSTA; and DEPUTY NICHOLAS CRAIG, and against Plaintiffs SAM PIRO

g

and SHANNON PIRO as to all causes of action in the Plaintiffs' First Amended

1o

Complaint; and that Defendants COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DEPUTY

11

ANTONIO ACOSTA; and DEPUTY NICHOLAS CRAIG, be awarded their

12

statutory costs as allowable by law, and may file a motion for an award of

13
14
15
16

reasonable attorney's fees, if appropriate.
DATED: 12/27/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19

20
21
22

23
24

25
26
27

28
2

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT