US Composite Pipe South, LLC et al v. Flowtite Technology AS et al

Filing 59

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal Re Stipulation 58 : hereby ORDERS: 1. The Complaint and this entire action are dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. No ad mission of liability is made by any Plaintiff or Defendant in connection with the dismissal, the dismissal shall not be construed as such, and neither Plaintiffs nor Defendants are to be considered prevailing parties; 3. Parties shall each bear their own fees and costs, including attorneys fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ad)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JS-6

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EASTERN DIVISION

11
12
13
14

U.S. COMPOSITE PIPE SOUTH, LLC,
d/b/a THOMPSON PIPE GROUP
FLOWTITE, and KTI, INC.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiffs,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT
Judge: Hon. Jesus G. Bernal

v.
FLOWTITE TECHNOLOGY AS, a
Norwegian company; AMITECH USA,
LLC, a Ohio limited liability company;
SAUDI ARABIAN AMIANTIT
COMPANY, a Saudi Arabian company;
WIG WIETERSDORFER HOLDING
GMBH, an Austrian company, HOBAS
AG a Swiss company; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,

24

Case No. 5:17-cv-01629-JGB-KK

Complaint Filed: August 11, 2017
Trial Date: None set

Defendants.

25
26
27
28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-01629-JGB-KK

VEDDER PRICE (CA), LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

4846-8559-6255.v2
LOS_ANGELES/#39056

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ORDER
The Court, having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Without Prejudice,
Pursuant to Settlement, entered into between U.S. Composite Pipe South, LLC,
d/b/a Thompson Pipe Group Flowtite (“USCP”) and KTI, Inc. (“KTI”) (collectively
“Plaintiffs”) and defendants Flowtite Technology, AS (“FTEC”), Saudi Arabian
Amiantit

Company

(“Amiantit”),

WIG

Wietersdorfer

Holding

GmbH

(“Wietersdorfer”), and Hobas Management GmbH — as legal successor to Hobas
AG — (“Hobas”) (collectively “Defendants”), hereby ORDERS:
1.

The Complaint and this entire action are dismissed, without prejudice,

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
2.

No admission of liability is made by any Plaintiff or Defendant in

connection with the dismissal, the dismissal shall not be construed as such,
and neither Plaintiffs nor Defendants are to be considered prevailing parties;
3.

Parties shall each bear their own fees and costs, including attorneys’

fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19

Dated: March 15, 2018
HON. JESUS G. BERNAL
G. BERNAL
HON.
UNITED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

VEDDER PRICE (CA), LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

ORDER DISMISSING
ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-01629-JGB-KK
4846-8559-6255.v2

LOS_ANGELES/#39056