Kristine A. Kauffman v. Target Corporation et al
Filing
11
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (See Order for further details) remanding case to Riverside Superior Court-Indio Civil Division, Case number PSC1703809 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (yl)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION
10
11
12
KRISTINE A. KAUFFMAN, an
individual,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No.: 5:17−cv−01699−BRO (JPRx)
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT
vs.
TARGET CORPORATION, a
Minnesota corporation, and Does 1 to 15,
inclusive,
Defendants.
17
Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff KRISTINE A.
18
19
KAUFFMAN and Defendant, TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause
20
appearing therefor:
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff KRISTINE A. KAUFFMAN, as
22
a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the
23
Complaint filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
24
Riverside (Case No. PSC1703809) entitled Kristine A. Kauffman v. Target
25
Corporation (the “State Court Action”), has incurred total damages, if any, that do
26
not, and will never be claimed to, exceed $75,000.00. Accordingly, this case does
27
not meet the jurisdictional requirements for removal as defined in 28 U.S.C.
28
///
-1-
1
§1332(a), and this matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of California,
2
County of Riverside.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
DATED: October 13, 2017
6
7
8
9
……
By: ….
Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?