Kristine A. Kauffman v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 11

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (See Order for further details) remanding case to Riverside Superior Court-Indio Civil Division, Case number PSC1703809 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (yl)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 KRISTINE A. KAUFFMAN, an individual, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Case No.: 5:17−cv−01699−BRO (JPRx) ORDER REMANDING CASE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT vs. TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, and Does 1 to 15, inclusive, Defendants. 17 Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff KRISTINE A. 18 19 KAUFFMAN and Defendant, TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause 20 appearing therefor: 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff KRISTINE A. KAUFFMAN, as 22 a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the 23 Complaint filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of 24 Riverside (Case No. PSC1703809) entitled Kristine A. Kauffman v. Target 25 Corporation (the “State Court Action”), has incurred total damages, if any, that do 26 not, and will never be claimed to, exceed $75,000.00. Accordingly, this case does 27 not meet the jurisdictional requirements for removal as defined in 28 U.S.C. 28 /// -1- 1 §1332(a), and this matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of California, 2 County of Riverside. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATED: October 13, 2017 6 7 8 9 …… By: …. Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?