Monique Charisse Hunt v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 16 . The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED.Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mz)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Brian C. Shapiro Attorney at Law: 192789 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-5491 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Monique Charisse Hunt 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 MONIQUE CHARISSE HUNT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 ) Case No.: 5:17-cv-01730-AS ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: January 9, 2018 /S/ Alka Sagar ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE ALKA SAGAR UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 -1- 1 2 3 4 DATE: December 27, 2017 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Brian C. Shapiro BY: __________________ Brian C. Shapiro Attorney for plaintiff Monique Charisse Hunt 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR CASE NUMBER 5:17-CV-01730-AS I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on December 29, 2017. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. /s/ Brian C. Shapiro _______________________________ Brian C. Shapiro Attorneys for Plaintiff ___________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?